This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kroger, R. O. Articles by Leong, I. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Are the Rules of Address Universal?

A Test of Chinese Usage

University of Toronto

Ken Cheng

University of Toronto

Ishbel Leong

University of Toronto

Our question was: Does the alleged universality of Brown's Invariant Norm of Address (1965) extend to Chinese usage? Or, does the alleged universal relationship between social power and intimacy and between inequality and equality hold for Chinese social structure? To answer these questions, we developed three quantitative indices which measure the degrees of reciprocity, solidarity, and inequality in dyadic address exchanges. The indices permit the precise comparison of empirical results with theoretical predictions and of address usage across languages. Seventy Chinese speakers forming a diverse sample reported actual address usage received from and sent to 27 interactants. The results revealed the structure of address usage among Chinese speakers and provided unequivocal support for Brown's prediction such that we may confidently add Chinese to the series of languages which jointly support the claim for the universality of the Invariant Norm. The relationship between studies in the semantics of social structure and the emerging alternative social-psychological strategy of ethogeny is noted.

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 10, No. 4, 395-414 (1979)
DOI: 10.1177/0022022179104001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. O. Kroger and L. A. Wood Are the Rules of Address Universal?: IV: Comparison of Chinese, Korean, Greek, and German Usage Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, June 1, 1992; 23(2): 148 - 162. [Abstract]

				L. A. Wood and R. O. Kroger Politeness and Forms of Address Journal of Language and Social Psychology, September 1, 1991; 10(3): 145 - 168. [Abstract]

				L. A. Wood, R. O. Kroger, and I. Leong Social Competence and the Rules of Address Journal of Language and Social Psychology, September 1, 1986; 5(3): 161 - 179. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. O. Kroger, L. A. Wood, and T. Beam Are the Rules of Address Universal?: II: Greek Usage Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, September 1, 1984; 15(3): 259 - 272. [Abstract]