Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Irvine, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Reuning, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

"Perceptual Speed" and Cognitive Controls

Tasks in Reconstructing Group Test Theory and Practice within and Across Cultures

S. H. Irvine

Plymouth Polytechnic

H. Reuning

National Institute for Personnel Research

Derived from cognitive psychology, a theoretical approach to group test construction resulted in the production of simple cognitive tasks suitable for use with literate subjects. Group performance was modified by the encoding demands of different stimulus properties. Performance was also affected by giving instructions to subjects that altered deep structure attentional controls on encoding propositions about the stimuli. Individual differences in performance on the tasks were substantial. The model for individual and group performance is additive, and it appears robust within individuals as well as across groups representing "idealized" individuals. Confirmatory replications were obtained across cultures, developmental stages, in long- and short-term work periods, and across symbol types. These are summarized. In the discussion the authors conclude that cognitive theory must be the basis for future test development. They assert, finally, that comparative assessment of cognitive functions within or across cultures cannot proceed until tests and scores derived from them are capable of construct validation outside the scope of traditional psychometric methods.

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 12, No. 4, 425-444 (1981)
DOI: 10.1177/0022022181124003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
F. J.R. Van De Vijver and Y. H. Poortinga
Cross-Cultural Generalization and Universality
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, December 1, 1982; 13(4): 387 - 408.
[Abstract]