This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Gabrenya, W. K. Articles by Wang, Y.-E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Social Loafing in Cross-Cultural Perspective

Chinese on Taiwan

Florida Institute Of Technology

Bibb Latane

University of North Carolina

Yue-Eng Wang

Florida Institute Of Technology

Research conducted in the United States indicates that people exert greater effort in a variety of task situations when they perform individually than when they do so in a group that obscures identifiability of members' individual outputs, a phenomenon termed "social loafing." It was hypothesized that members of cultures whose value emphases and social institutions have been characterized as "group-oriented" would tend to form more cohesive groups and be more likely to place group benefit over individual benefit than members of individualistic U.S. culture, hence evidencing less social loafing. Contrary to this expectation, Chinese school children on Taiwan (grades 2 through 9), asked to produce sound by clapping and shouting alone and in pairs, evidenced levels of social loafing similar to those obtained in U.S. research employing this procedure. Several sources of this absence of a relationship between social loafing and cultural values are discussed, including the effects of the social restrictiveness of the sound production procedure on its ability to tap cultural differences.

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 14, No. 3, 368-384 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/0022002183014003009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. F. Crown The Use of Group and Groupcentric Individual Goals for Culturally Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Task Groups: An Assessment of European Work Teams Small Group Research, August 1, 2007; 38(4): 489 - 508. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. C. Chen, M. W. Peng, and P. A. Saparito Individualism, Collectivism, and Opportunism: A Cultural Perspective on Transaction Cost Economics Journal of Management, August 1, 2002; 28(4): 567 - 583. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. L. Munroe and M. Gauvain Why the Paraphilias? Domesticating Strange Sex Cross-Cultural Research, February 1, 2001; 35(1): 44 - 64. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. E. McCorkle, J. Reardon, J. F. Alexander, N. D. Kling, R. C. Harris, and R. V. Iyer Undergraduate Marketing Students, Group Projects, and Teamwork: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly? Journal of Marketing Education, August 1, 1999; 21(2): 106 - 117. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Sewell Be Seeing You:: A Rejoinder to Webster and Robins and to Jenkins Sociology, November 1, 1996; 30(4): 785 - 797. [PDF]

				W. K. Gabrenya Jr., Y.-E. Wang, and B. Latane Social Loafing on an Optimizing Task: Cross-Cultural Differences among Chinese and Americans Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, June 1, 1985; 16(2): 223 - 242. [Abstract]