Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here to browse PSPB online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Church, A. T.
Right arrow Articles by Katigbak, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Imposed-Etic and Emic Measures of Intelligence as Predictors of Early School Performance of Rural Philippine Children

A. Timothy Church

Washington State University

Marcia S. Katigbak

Washington State University

Emic and imposed-etic strategies were applied to the assessment of intelligence in rural Philippine children. Emic (culture-specific) measures assessed children's "intelligence" as conceptualized by rural adults. We concluded that Western-type (imposed-etic) tests measure a concept of intelligence that only partially overlaps emic conceptions. The imposed-etic measures were better than the emic measures as predictors of school performance, which could be viewed as an imposed-etic criterion. Most indigenous (emic) competencies showed no relationship to school performance. Thus what is "intelligent" in everyday barrio functioning ("everyday intelligence') is distinct from "academic intelligence."

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 19, No. 2, 164-177 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/0022022188192003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Journal of Behavioral DevelopmentHome page
C. Liddell, J. Lycett, and G. Rae
Getting through Grade 2: Predicting Children's Early School Achievement in Rural South African Schools
International Journal of Behavioral Development, August 1, 1997; 21(2): 331 - 348.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychology Developing SocietiesHome page
C. Liddell
Failing Grade 1: South African Children's First Encounters with School
Psychology Developing Societies, September 1, 1996; 8(2): 223 - 244.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cross-Cultural ResearchHome page
D. M. McInerney
Achievement Motivation and Indigenous Minorities: Can Research Be Psychometric?
Cross-Cultural Research, August 1, 1995; 29(3): 211 - 239.
[Abstract] [PDF]