This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Guthrie, G. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Unexpected Correlations and the Cross-Cultural Method

Pennsylvania State University

Cross-cultural studies, in which the cases are societies rather than individuals, may be subject to errors due to individual differences within societies, cultural differences in behavior variables, and the implicit theories of the observers. In addition, antecedent variables may correlate more highly with unexpected consequences than with dependent variables predicted from theory. Ratings provided by Whiting and Child (1953) were correlated and the resulting matrix of correlations between all antecedent and all dependent variables was examined. Off-diagonal correlations, e.g., that between oral socialization anxiety and anal explanations of illness, were often found to be as high as correlations predicted from psychoanalytic theory. It was concluded that the caution suggested by Campbell and Fiske (1959) for validity studies should be applied to crosscultural studies.

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 2, No. 4, 315-324 (1971)
DOI: 10.1177/002202217100200402


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?