Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to browse PSPB online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walker, C.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, T. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Cross-Cultural Study of the Perception of Situational Causality

Crane Walker

University of Georgia; psychologist in Carrollton, Ga.

E. P. Torrance

University of Georgia

Timothy S. Walker

University of Georgia;West Georgia College, Carrollton, Ga.

This study was designed to test developmental, cross-cultural, and sex differences in the perception of situational causality. Three hundred fifty-nine (359) Ss were divided by grade (third and sixth), culture (United States and Indian), and sex. It was hypothesized that developmental, cross-cultural, and sex differences would be found in the perception of situational causality. Ss were shown a picture depicting a Mother Goose nursery rhyme and were asked what might have caused the action shown in the picture. Responses were categorized as Causal, Phenomenistic, Consequential, Descriptive, or Other. Means were computed for each group and category and hypothesized differences were tested by means of the Student's t test. All cross-cultural differences were significant and developmental differences were found to be significant for United States children but not for children in the Indian culture.

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 2, No. 4, 401-404 (1971)
DOI: 10.1177/002202217100200411


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
H. Langgulung and E. P. Torrance
The Development of Causal Thinking of Children in Mexico and the United States
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, September 1, 1972; 3(3): 315 - 320.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
P. R. Dasen
Cross-Cultural Piagetian Research: A Summary
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, March 1, 1972; 3(1): 23 - 40.
[Abstract]