This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Dake, K. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Orienting Dispositions in the Perception of Risk

An Analysis of Contemporary Worldviews and Cultural Biases

Institute of Personality Assessment and Research University of California, Berkeley

Cultural biases based on the anthropological work of Mary Douglas and her colleagues are compared to contemporary worldviews deriving from a psychological approach to the issues of risk and culture. It is argued that these orienting dispositions guide the perception of risk at both the collective and individual levels, with cultural biases referring to shared beliefs and values, and contemporary worldviews representing a person's way of responding to controversies over technology and society. Drawing on day-long assessments of 300 San Francisco Bay area citizens, it is shown that the cultural biases of Hierarchy, Individualism, and Egalitarianism are predictive of distinctive rankings of possible dangers and preferences for risk taking at the societal level. Findings on the relations among personality, political ideology, and orienting dispositions advance and clarify a research agenda linking individuals, social structures, and cultural biases.

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 22, No. 1, 61-82 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0022022191221006


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M.-F. Fan Public perceptions and the nuclear waste repository on Orchid Island, Taiwan Public Understanding of Science, March 1, 2009; 18(2): 167 - 176. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. B. Van Fossen Risk Havens: Offshore Financial Centres, Insurance Cycles, the 'Litigation Explosion' and a Social Democratic Alternative Social Legal Studies, December 1, 2002; 11(4): 503 - 521. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. Poortinga, L. Steg, and C. Vlek Environmental Risk Concern and Preferences for Energy-Saving Measures Environment and Behavior, July 1, 2002; 34(4): 455 - 478. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Olli, G. Grendstad, and D. Wollebaek Correlates of Environmental Behaviors: Bringing Back Social Context Environment and Behavior, March 1, 2001; 33(2): 181 - 208. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Steg and I. Sievers Cultural Theory and Individual Perceptions of Environmental Risks Environment and Behavior, March 1, 2000; 32(2): 250 - 269. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Burns and P. Sullivan Perceptions of Danger, Risk Taking, and Outcomes in a Remote Community Environment and Behavior, January 1, 2000; 32(1): 32 - 71. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. D. Caulkins Is Mary Douglas's Grid/Group Analysis Useful for Cross-Cultural Research? Cross-Cultural Research, February 1, 1999; 33(1): 108 - 128. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Goodwin, G. Nizharadze, L. A. N. Luu, E. Kosa, and T. Emelyanova Glasnost and the Art of Conversation: A Multilevel Analysis of Intimate Disclosure Across Three Former Communist Cultures Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, January 1, 1999; 30(1): 72 - 90. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Grendstad and D. Wollebaek Greener Still?: An Empirical Examination of Eckersley's Ecocentric Approach Environment and Behavior, September 1, 1998; 30(5): 653 - 675. [Abstract]

				T. Dietz, P. C. Stern, and G. A. Guagnano Social Structural and Social Psychological Bases of Environmental Concern Environment and Behavior, July 1, 1998; 30(4): 450 - 471. [Abstract]

				R. B. Goodwin Personal Relationships and Social Change: The `Realpolitik' of Cross-Cultural Research in Transient Cultures Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, April 1, 1998; 15(2): 227 - 247. [Abstract]

				P. Slovic, T. Malmfors, C. Mertz, N. Neil, and I. F. Purchase Evaluating chemical risks: results of a survey of the British Toxicology Society Human and Experimental Toxicology, June 1, 1997; 16(6): 289 - 304. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Goodwin The Privatization of the Personal? I: Intimate Disclosure in Modern-Day Russia Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, February 1, 1995; 12(1): 121 - 131. [Abstract]

				R. Goodwin and T. Emelyanova The Privatization of the Personal? II: Attitudes to the Family and Child-Rearing Values in Modern-Day Russia Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, February 1, 1995; 12(1): 132 - 138. [Abstract]