Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iwao, S.
Right arrow Articles by Trlandis, H. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Validity of Auto- and Ieterostereotypes among Japanese and American Students

Sumiko Iwao

Keio University, Japan

Harry C. Trlandis

University of Illinois

Japanese and American undergraduates responded to three scenarios describing interaction among individuals who had conflicting views. They provided judgments about their own and others' behavior in such situations and of "typical" Japanese and Americans, thereby providing auto- and heterostereotypes of these samples. The "validity" of these stereotypes is reflected in the rank-order correlations of "own" and "typical" judgments, and was found to be a function of the similarity of the two cultures when reacting to a particular episode. Many of these stereotypes reflected "false consensus." Thus, when the cultures were similar in their perceptions of an episode the stereotypes were valid, and when they were dissimilar they were invalid. The Japanese responses suggested that the Japanese sample passively accepted inconsistencies between their public and private self in such situations and behaved according to the group norm (public self), even when their attitudes (private self) were inconsistent with such behavior. Americans showed an active reduction of the discrepancy between private and public self (e.g., tried to make the other's attitudes like their own).

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 24, No. 4, 428-444 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0022022193244004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?