Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Han, G.
Right arrow Articles by Park, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Children'S Choice in Conflict

Application of the Theory of Individualism-Collectivism

Gyuseog Han

Chonnam National University, South Korea

Bongsoon Park

Chonnam National University, South Korea

To check the validity of individualism-collectivism theory in understanding conflict behaviors within a culture, two experiments were run using vignette method. In Experiment 1, children (half Individualists and half Collectivists) were asked to resolve a conflict in which their wish was incompatible with that of another. The other belonged to various in-groups or out-groups. The Collectivists showed far greater discrimination between in-group and out-group members than did the Individualists. In Experiment 2, the same children were asked to play the role of an allocator who, having contributed more to a task, was to divide the reward between him- or herself and the co-worker. Two independent variables manipulated were the co-worker's membership (in-group/ out-group) and the likelihood of future interaction with the co-worker (high/low). Individualists favored an equitable division over an equal division regardless of the experimental manipulations. The Collectivists, however, favored the equitable division only in the out-group-low future interaction condition. In other conditions, they favored equal division. The results provide strong support to the theory of collectivism-individualism, originally developed to understand cross-cultural differences in social acts.

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 26, No. 3, 298-313 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0022022195263005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
A. S. Carson and A. Banuazizi
"That's Not Fair": Similarities and Differences in Distributive Justice Reasoning Between American and Filipino Children
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, July 1, 2008; 39(4): 493 - 514.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Behavioral DevelopmentHome page
L. Oppenheimer
Perception of individualism and collectivism in Dutch society: A developmental approach
International Journal of Behavioral Development, July 1, 2004; 28(4): 336 - 346.
[Abstract] [PDF]