Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hatfield, E.
Right arrow Articles by Sprecher, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Men's and Women's Preferences in Marital Partners in the United States, Russia, and Japan

Elaine Hatfield

University of Hawai'i

Susan Sprecher

Illinois State University

In this investigation, data on young, single adults' preferences in marital partners were gathered from three very diverse cultures: the United States, Russia, and Japan. Based on evolutionary, social learning, historical, and cross-cultural perspectives, the authors hypothesized that in all three cultures they would find certain traditional gender differences. Men would care more than women about physical attractiveness, whereas women would care more than men about status (e.g., intelligence; ambition; money, status, and position; potential for success) and personality attributes (e.g., kindness, understanding, expressiveness, openness). Women would be more "choosy" overall than would men. The authors also hypothesized thatpeople from the United States (a Western individualist culture) would expect more from their relationships than would those from Japan (an Eastern collectivist culture). Finally, the authors predicted that gender differences would be smallest in the United States and largest in Japan. They found strong support for all but the last of these hypotheses and found weak support for that one.

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 26, No. 6, 728-750 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/002202219502600613


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
R. N. Lalonde, M. Hynie, M. Pannu, and S. Tatla
The Role of Culture in Interpersonal Relationships: Do Second Generation South Asian Canadians Want a Traditional Partner?
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, September 1, 2004; 35(5): 503 - 524.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
S. Sprecher and P. C. Regan
Liking Some Things (in Some People) more than Others: Partner Preferences in Romantic Relationships and Friendships
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, August 1, 2002; 19(4): 463 - 481.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
K. Seki, D. Matsumoto, and T. T. Imahori
The Conceptualization and Expression of Intimacy in Japan and the United States
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, May 1, 2002; 33(3): 303 - 319.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
S. Stewart, H. Stinnett, and L. B. Rosenfeld
Sex Differences in Desired Characteristics of Short-Term and Long-Term Relationship Partners
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, December 1, 2000; 17(6): 843 - 853.
[Abstract] [PDF]