This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Na, E.-Y. Articles by Lofius, E. F. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Attitudes Toward Law and Prisoners, Conservative Authoritarianism, Attribution, and Internal-External Locus of Control

Korean and American Law Students and Undergraduates

Chonbuk National University, Korea

Elizabeth F. Lofius

University of Washington

The purposes of this study were (a) to compare collectivistic Koreans' and individualistic Americans' attitudes toward law and prisoners with relative legal expertise as a moderator of culture effect and (b) to identify culture-dependent mediational variables (i.e., conservative authoritarianism, attribution, and locus of control) that may predict those attitudes. Four groups (Korean and American law students and undergraduates) were surveyed by a questionnaire. Cultural differences in legal attitudes were more remarkable between the undergraduates of two countries than between their law student counterparts. Korean undergraduates had less positive attitudes toward law than did Korean law students and had more positive attitudes toward prisoners than did American undergraduates. Koreans were more lenient to criminals and made more external attributions of crimes than did Americans. Altogether, internal locus of control and authoritarianism had strong positive effects on attitudes toward law, and authoritarianism and internal attribution had strong negative effects on attitudes toward prisoners.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. M. Darley and T. S. Pittman The Psychology of Compensatory and Retributive Justice Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2003; 7(4): 324 - 336. [Abstract] [PDF]