Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keltikangas-Järvinen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Pakaslahti, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 30, No. 3, 267-290 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0022022199030003001

Moral Reasoning among Estonian and Finnish Adolescents

A Comparison of Collectivist and Individual Settings

Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen

University of Helsinki, Finland

Tuuli Terav

University of Helsinki, Finland

Laura Pakaslahti

University of Helsinki, Finland

The moral reasoning of 14- and 17-year-old Finnish adolescents (n = 1,230) who grew up in Finland and experienced Western individualistic educational practices was compared with that of adolescents (n = 428) of the same age who grew up in Estonia during the period of Soviet socialism with collectivist educational practices. The same factors of moral reasoning were found in both samples: legitimization (attributing the responsibility to external factors), relativism, absoluteness, and universality of high moral standards. The results showed that the moral reasoning of Finnish participants had a higher internal consistency, whereas two levels were likely to exist in Estonia: a set of universal standards for what people ought to do and a different set for personal applications. The finding is discussed in terms of primary principles of collectivist education (i.e., a collective consciousness, a relative insignificance of family and parenting, and a lack of primary developmental context) as well as in the light of historical processes underlying the present time.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
Y. S. GonzaLez, D. S. Moreno, and B. H. Schneider
Friendship Expectations of Early Adolescents in Cuba and Canada
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, July 1, 2004; 35(4): 436 - 445.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
D. Matsumoto, R. J. Grissom, and D. L. Dinnel
Do Between-Culture Differences Really Mean that People are Different?: A Look at Some Measures of Cultural Effect Size
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, July 1, 2001; 32(4): 478 - 490.
[Abstract] [PDF]