This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Little, T. D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

On the Comparability of Constructs in Cross-Cultural Research

A Critique of Cheung and Rensvold

Yale University, Todd.Little{at}Yale.edu

A critique of Cheung and Rensvold’s article describing the use of mean and covariance structures (MACS) techniques for assessing bias in cross-cultural research is offered. In particular, the author highlights the critical distinction between item bias and construct bias. Although the author’s view is in fundamental agreement with Cheung and Rensvold’s primary argument that MACS analyses are a very useful tool to determine comparability of constructs across cultural settings, The author disagrees with their conclusion that measurement invariance indicates a lack of construct bias. The author argues that cross-group equivalence of all reliable measurement parameters only indicates a lack of differential item bias and does not indicate lack of construct bias. Finally, two related and important issues in MACS analyses are discussed, namely, (a) the choice of rationale for significance testing and (b) the effects of different identification methods on estimating latent mean levels.

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 31, No. 2, 213-219 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0022022100031002004


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Fischer Where Is Culture in Cross Cultural Research?: An Outline of a Multilevel Research Process for Measuring Culture as a Shared Meaning System International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, April 1, 2009; 9(1): 25 - 49. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Matsunaga and T. T. Imahori Profiling Family Communication Standards: A U.S.-Japan Comparison Communication Research, February 1, 2009; 36(1): 3 - 31. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Aegisdottir, L. H. Gerstein, and D. C. Cinarbas Methodological Issues in Cross-Cultural Counseling Research: Equivalence, Bias, and Translations The Counseling Psychologist, March 1, 2008; 36(2): 188 - 219. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Lucas, M. R. Parkhill, C. A. Wendorf, E. Olcay Imamoglu, C. C. Weisfeld, G. E. Weisfeld, and Jiliang Shen Cultural and Evolutionary Components of Marital Satisfaction: A Multidimensional Assessment of Measurement Invariance Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, January 1, 2008; 39(1): 109 - 123. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Mueller, C. Liebig, and K. Hattrup Computerizing Organizational Attitude Surveys: An Investigation of the Measurement Equivalence of a Multifaceted Job Satisfaction Measure Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2007; 67(4): 658 - 678. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. P. Schmitt, J. Allik, R. R. McCrae, and V. Benet-Martinez The Geographic Distribution of Big Five Personality Traits: Patterns and Profiles of Human Self-Description Across 56 Nations Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, March 1, 2007; 38(2): 173 - 212. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. J. Arce-Ferrer An Investigation Into the Factors Influencing Extreme-Response Style: Improving Meaning of Translated and Culturally Adapted Rating Scales Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 2006; 66(3): 374 - 392. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. I. Chirkov, R. M. Ryan, and C. Willness Cultural Context and Psychological Needs in Canada and Brazil: Testing a Self-Determination Approach to the Internalization of Cultural Practices, Identity, and Well-Being Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, July 1, 2005; 36(4): 423 - 443. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. K. Pellegrini and T. A. Scandura Construct Equivalence across Groups: An Unexplored Issue in Mentoring Research Educational and Psychological Measurement, April 1, 2005; 65(2): 323 - 335. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Fischer Standardization to Account for Cross-Cultural Response Bias: A Classification of Score Adjustment Procedures and Review of Research in JCCP Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, May 1, 2004; 35(3): 263 - 282. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. J. Arce-Ferrer and J. J. Ketterer The Effect of Scale Tailoring for Cross-Cultural Application on Scale Reliability and Construct Validity Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 2003; 63(3): 484 - 501. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Dekovic, R. C. M. E. Engels, T. Shirai, G. de Kort, and A. L. Anker The Role of Peer Relations in Adolescent Development in Two Cultures: The Netherlands and Japan Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, November 1, 2002; 33(6): 577 - 595. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. J. Vandenberg Toward a Further Understanding of and Improvement in Measurement Invariance Methods and Procedures Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2002; 5(2): 139 - 158. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. I. Chirkov and R. M. Ryan Parent and Teacher Autonomy-Support in Russian and U.S. Adolescents: Common Effects on Well-Being and Academic Motivation Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, September 1, 2001; 32(5): 618 - 635. [Abstract] [PDF]