Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Sagie, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Value Consensus and Importance

A Cross-National Study

Shalom H. Schwartz

The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel

Galit Sagie

The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel

Societal value consensus has been widely discussed but rarely studied empirically. The authors developed a definition and an operational index for value consensus suitable for cross-national comparisons. They then generated and tested hypotheses concerning causal impacts of socioeconomic development and political democratization on both value importance and value consensus in a society. Data are from matched samples of teachers from 42 nations (N = 7,856) who completed a survey that measures 10 distinct types of values. Both development and democratization correlate positively with the importance of openness and self-transcendence values, and negatively with the importance of conservation and self-enhancement values. Development and democratization have opposite relations to value consensus, suppressing one another’s effects. Development increases overall value consensus, whereas democratization decreases it. Differences between effects on specific value types are discussed.

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 31, No. 4, 465-497 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0022022100031004003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
N. L. Hughes
Changing Faces: Adaptation of Highly Skilled Chinese Workers to a High-Tech Multinational Corporation
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, June 1, 2009; 45(2): 212 - 238.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
J. I.M. De Groot and L. Steg
Value Orientations and Environmental Beliefs in Five Countries: Validity of an Instrument to Measure Egoistic, Altruistic and Biospheric Value Orientations
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, May 1, 2007; 38(3): 318 - 332.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
B. Lamm and H. Keller
Understanding Cultural Models of Parenting: The Role of Intracultural Variation and Response Style
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, January 1, 2007; 38(1): 50 - 57.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
A. Terracciano and R. R. McCrae
Perceptions of Americans and the Iraq Invasion: Implications for Understanding National Character Stereotypes.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, January 1, 2007; 38(6): 695 - 710.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
M. W.-L. Cheung, K. Leung, and K. Au
Evaluating Multilevel Models in Cross-Cultural Research: An Illustration With Social Axioms
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, September 1, 2006; 37(5): 522 - 541.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Cross Cultural ManagementHome page
R. Fischer, M. C. Ferreira, E. M. L. Assmar, P. Redford, and C. Harb
Organizational Behaviour across Cultures: Theoretical and Methodological Issues for Developing Multi-level Frameworks Involving Culture
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, April 1, 2005; 5(1): 27 - 48.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
R. Goodwin, A. Kozlova, G. Nizharadze, and G. Polyakova
HIV/AIDS among Adolescents in Eastern Europe: Knowledge of HIV/AIDS, Social Representations of Risk and Sexual Activity among School Children and Homeless Adolescents in Russia, Georgia and the Ukraine
J Health Psychol, May 1, 2004; 9(3): 381 - 396.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
D. Spini
Measurement Equivalence Of 10 Value Types From The Schwartz Value Survey Across 21 Countries
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, January 1, 2003; 34(1): 3 - 23.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
R. Goodwin, A. Realo, A. Kwiatkowska, A. Kozlova, L. A. N. Luu, and G. Nizharadze
Values and Sexual Behaviour in Central and Eastern Europe
J Health Psychol, January 1, 2002; 7(1): 45 - 56.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
P. B. Smith
Culture's Consequences: Something Old and Something New
Human Relations, January 1, 2002; 55(1): 119 - 135.
[PDF]


Home page
Psychology Developing SocietiesHome page
P. B. Smith
Cross-cultural Psychology: Where Next?
Psychology Developing Societies, September 1, 2001; 13(2): 141 - 151.
[Abstract] [PDF]