Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirkman, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Shapiro, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Impact of Team Members’ Cultural Values on Productivity, Cooperation, and Empowerment in Self-Managing Work Teams

Bradley L. Kirkman

University of North Carolina at Greensboro, brad_kirkman{at}uncg.edu

Debra L. Shapiro

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Using a field survey of 81 self-managing work teams (SMWTs) in Belgium, Finland, the Philippines, and the United States, we examined the extent to which team members’ resistance to SMWTs mediated the relationships between team members’ cultural values and team effectiveness. Specifically, we found that teams higher, rather than lower, in collectivism were also more productive, cooperative, and empowered; and that these relationships were fully mediated by the level of team resistance to the team-related aspect of SMWTs. Also, we found that teams that were more, rather than less, doing-oriented were also more empowered, and that this relationship was fully mediated by the level of team resistance to the self-managing aspect of SMWTs. The findings suggest that it may behoove managers who are charged with implementing SMWTs to pay close attention to the predominant cultural values inherent in the teams they lead. Additional practical and theoretical implications are discussed.

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 32, No. 5, 597-617 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0022022101032005005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
J. Mathieu, M. T. Maynard, T. Rapp, and L. Gilson
Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future
Journal of Management, June 1, 2008; 34(3): 410 - 476.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management EducationHome page
M. Humes and A. H. Reilly
Managing Intercultural Teams: the Eorganization Exercise
Journal of Management Education, February 1, 2008; 32(1): 118 - 137.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
A. R. Paquin, S. G. Roch, and M. L. Sanchez-Ku
An Investigation of Cross-Cultural Differences on the Impact of Productivity Interventions: The Example of ProMES
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, December 1, 2007; 43(4): 427 - 448.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
A. S. Tsui, S. S. Nifadkar, and Amy Yi Ou
Cross-National, Cross-Cultural Organizational Behavior Research: Advances, Gaps, and Recommendations
Journal of Management, June 1, 2007; 33(3): 426 - 478.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
R. Fischer
Standardization to Account for Cross-Cultural Response Bias: A Classification of Score Adjustment Procedures and Review of Research in JCCP
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, May 1, 2004; 35(3): 263 - 282.
[Abstract] [PDF]