This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Nelson, M. R. Articles by Shavitt, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Achievement Values

A Multimethod Examination of Denmark and the United States

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Sharon Shavitt

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

The horizontal and vertical distinction within individualism and collectivism was used as a theoretical framework to predict differences in achievement values across two national cultures: Denmark and the United States. As expected, across multiple methods and informant groups, the United States was found to be more vertically oriented than Denmark and Denmark more horizontally oriented than the United States. These differences in cultural orientations also corresponded to differences in the importance placed on achievement and the display of success. In open-ended responses and quantitative ratings, U.S. individuals discussed the importance of achieving goals more frequently and evaluated achievement values more highly than Danes did. Implications for understanding the cultural antecedents of achievement values are discussed.

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 33, No. 5, 439-458 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0022022102033005001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Matsunaga and T. T. Imahori Profiling Family Communication Standards: A U.S.-Japan Comparison Communication Research, February 1, 2009; 36(1): 3 - 31. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. L. Gardner, B. J. Reithel, R. T. Foley, C. C. Cogliser, and F. O. Walumbwa Attraction to Organizational Culture Profiles: Effects of Realistic Recruitment and Vertical and Horizontal Individualism--Collectivism Management Communication Quarterly, February 1, 2009; 22(3): 437 - 472. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. B. Pillemer, Z. Ivcevic, R. A. Gooze, and K. A. Collins Self-Esteem Memories: Feeling Good About Achievement Success, Feeling Bad About Relationship Distress Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2007; 33(9): 1292 - 1305. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Hoi Yan Cheung and A. W. H. Chan How Culture Affects Female Inequality Across Countries: An Empirical Study Journal of Studies in International Education, June 1, 2007; 11(2): 157 - 179. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Johnson, P. Kulesa, I. Llc, Y. I. Cho, and S. Shavitt The Relation Between Culture and Response Styles: Evidence From 19 Countries Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, March 1, 2005; 36(2): 264 - 277. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Fischer Standardization to Account for Cross-Cultural Response Bias: A Classification of Score Adjustment Procedures and Review of Research in JCCP Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, May 1, 2004; 35(3): 263 - 282. [Abstract] [PDF]