This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Murphy-Berman, V. Articles by Berman, J. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Micro- and Macro-Justicein the Allocation of Resources between in-Group and Out-Group Members

A Cross-Cultural Comparison

Skidmore College

Cem Safak Cukur

Universityof Nebraska-Lincoln

John J. Berman

Skidmore College

Respondents from Turkey and the United States solved micro- and macro-justice dilemmas requiring them to allocate scholarships and governance board memberships. Recipients were either groups or individuals who were members of respondents’in-groups or out-groups. Turkish respondents showed a stronger preference than U.S. respondents for macro deservingness only when recipients were from their in-groups and, in general, preferred in-group over out-group recipients. Both U.S. and Turkish respondents used macro principles more with group versus individual recipients.

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 33, No. 6, 626-632 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0022022102033006007


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?