Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spini, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 34, No. 1, 3-23 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0022022102239152

Measurement Equivalence Of 10 Value Types From The Schwartz Value Survey Across 21 Countries

Dario Spini

Universities of Lausanne and Geneva

Equivalence of measurement across cultures is a prerequisite for the generalization of an instrument. The measurement equivalence of 10 value types derived from Schwartz’s structural model of values and measured with the Schwartz Value Survey questionnaire is evaluated in 21 countries. Based on previous research by Schwartz and colleagues, the measurement equivalence of the 10 value types is tested separately using nested multigroup confirmatory factor analyses. Results indicate that it is possible for most value types to reach acceptable levels of configural and metric equivalence; only the dimension of Hedonism is rejected at these two levels of equivalence. Four value types (Benevolence, Conformity, Self-Direction, and Universalism) also show factor variance equivalence. The hypotheses of scalar and reliability equivalence are rejected for all value types. Indications are also given of the number of items to be included for measuring the value types at the different levels of equivalence.

Key Words:


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
J. R. J. Fontaine, Y. H. Poortinga, L. Delbeke, and S. H. Schwartz
Structural Equivalence of the Values Domain Across Cultures: Distinguishing Sampling Fluctuations From Meaningful Variation
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, July 1, 2008; 39(4): 345 - 365.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
S. L. Tragesser, F. Beauvais, R. C. Swaim, R. W. Edwards, and E. R. Oetting
Parental Monitoring, Peer Drug Involvement, and Marijuana Use Across Three Ethnicities
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, November 1, 2007; 38(6): 670 - 694.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
P. W. Schultz, V. V. Gouveia, L. D. Cameron, G. Tankha, P. Schmuck, and M. Franek
Values and their Relationship to Environmental Concern and Conservation Behavior
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, July 1, 2005; 36(4): 457 - 475.
[Abstract] [PDF]