|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Issue Of Measurement Invariance Revisited
Barbara M. Byrne
University of Ottawa
David Watkins
University of Hong Kong
The purposes of this study were twofold: (a) based on the analysis of covariance structures, to test for the equivalence of a well-known measuring instrument across two culturally diverse groups and (b) provided with findings of nonequivalent items, to identify possible determinants of their noninvariance; post hoc investigations included tests for evidence of item bias using an ANOVA-based approach and examination of graphical displays of item response and distributional patterns. Example data comprised item responses to the four nonacademic subscales of the Self Description Questionnaire I (SDQ-I) for Australian (N = 497) and Nigerian (N = 439) adolescents. Despite similarly specified and well-fitting factor structures for both cultural groups, findings revealed evidence of both measurement and structural noninvariance. Results underscore previous caveats regarding interpretation of instrument equivalence; they add also to the growing body of skepticism that queries whether measuring instruments can ever be totally equivalent when used in cross-cultural comparisons.
Key Words: multigroup invariance structural equation modeling cross-cultural comparisons self description questionnaire
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 34, No. 2,
155-175 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0022022102250225

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Han, G. N. Burns, N. C. Weed, G. T. Hatchett, and N. K. S. Kurokawa
Evaluation of an Observer Form of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
August 1, 2009;
69(4):
675 - 695.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Morrison, T. G. Morrison, and R. Franklin
Modern and Old-fashioned Homonegativity Among Samples of Canadian and American University Students
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
July 1, 2009;
40(4):
523 - 542.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Li and J. Reb
A Cross-Nations, Cross-Cultures, and Cross-Conditions Analysis on the Equivalence of the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
March 1, 2009;
40(2):
214 - 233.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Hoe and J. Brekke
Testing the Cross-Ethnic Construct Validity of the Brief Symptom Inventory
Research on Social Work Practice,
January 1, 2009;
19(1):
93 - 103.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. D. Penfield, N. D. Myers, and E. W. Wolfe
Methods for Assessing Item, Step, and Threshold Invariance in Polytomous Items Following the Partial Credit Model
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
October 1, 2008;
68(5):
717 - 733.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Prince-Embury and T. Courville
Measurement Invariance of the Resiliency Scales for Children and Adolescents With Respect to Sex and Age Cohorts
Canadian Journal of School Psychology,
June 1, 2008;
23(1):
26 - 40.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Rigotti, B. Schyns, and G. Mohr
A Short Version of the Occupational Self-Efficacy Scale: Structural and Construct Validity Across Five Countries
Journal of Career Assessment,
May 1, 2008;
16(2):
238 - 255.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Tragesser, F. Beauvais, R. C. Swaim, R. W. Edwards, and E. R. Oetting
Parental Monitoring, Peer Drug Involvement, and Marijuana Use Across Three Ethnicities
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
November 1, 2007;
38(6):
670 - 694.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. W.-L. Cheung, K. Leung, and K. Au
Evaluating Multilevel Models in Cross-Cultural Research: An Illustration With Social Axioms
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
September 1, 2006;
37(5):
522 - 541.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. W. Schultz, V. V. Gouveia, L. D. Cameron, G. Tankha, P. Schmuck, and M. Franek
Values and their Relationship to Environmental Concern and Conservation Behavior
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
July 1, 2005;
36(4):
457 - 475.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|