This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Allik, J. Articles by Realo, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Individualism-Collectivism and Social Capital

Anu Realo

University of Tartu, Estonia

Many social scientists have predicted that one inevitable consequence of modernization is the unlimited growth of individualism, which poses serious threats to the organic unity of society. Others have argued that autonomy and independence are necessary conditions for the development of interpersonal cooperation and social solidarity. We reanalyzed available data on the relationship between individualism-collectivism and social capital within one country (the United States) and across 42 countries. In America, the states with a high level of social capital (higher degree of civic engagement in political activity, where people spend more time with their friends and believe that most people can be trusted) were found to be more individualistic. A correspondingly strong association between individualism and social capital was observed in the comparison of different countries. These results support Durkheim’s view that whenindividualsbecomemoreautonomous and seemingly liberated from social bonds, they actually become even more dependent on society.

Key Words: individualism • collectivism • social capital

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 35, No. 1, 29-49 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0022022103260381


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. J. Smith In Defense of National Character Theory Psychology, August 1, 2008; 18(4): 465 - 482. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Realo, J. Allik, and B. Greenfield Radius of Trust: Social Capital in Relation to Familism and Institutional Collectivism Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, July 1, 2008; 39(4): 447 - 462. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Rostila Social capital and health in European welfare regimes: a multilevel approach Journal of European Social Policy, August 1, 2007; 17(3): 223 - 239. [Abstract] [PDF]

				X. Huang and E. Van de Vliert Job Formalization and Cultural Individualism as Barriers to Trust in Management International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, August 1, 2006; 6(2): 221 - 242. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Kemmelmeier, E. E. Jambor, and J. Letner Individualism and Good Works: Cultural Variation in Giving and Volunteering Across the United States Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, May 1, 2006; 37(3): 327 - 344. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. G. T. Green, J.-C. Deschamps, and D. Paez Variation of Individualism and Collectivism within and between 20 Countries: A Typological Analysis Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, May 1, 2005; 36(3): 321 - 339. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. B. Smith Nations, Cultures, and Individuals: New Perspectives and Old Dilemmas Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, January 1, 2004; 35(1): 6 - 12. [Abstract] [PDF]