This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tafarodi, R. W. Articles by Katsura, H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Inner Self in Three Countries

Christopher Lo

University of Toronto

Susumu Yamaguchi

University of Tokyo

Wincy W.-S. Lee

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Haruko Katsura

Hokkai-Gakuen University

Personal identity involves continuity of the inner or private self—the intimately familiar me—across time and place. Is this continuity experienced to a similar extent across cultures? East Asian cultures place greater moral emphasis than do Western cultures on the contextual adjustment of personal behavior. This adjustive focus translates into greater variation in the outwardly presented self across contexts, raising the question of whether the inner self is also experienced as less continuous or unchanging by East Asians. To examine this issue and its implications, we asked Canadian, Chinese, and Japanese students to answer a set of questions about the inner self and its behavioral expression. Their responses confirmed a weaker sense of continuity amongthe Chinese and Japanese but also revealed that socially appropriate expression of the innerself is valued and sought in all three countries. In addition, East Asians claimed to experience self-expression in fewer activity domains than did Canadians.

Key Words: personal identity • self-continuity • Canada • Hong Kong • Japan

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. J. Packer On Being Both With Us and Against Us: A Normative Conflict Model of Dissent in Social Groups Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2008; 12(1): 50 - 72. [Abstract] [PDF]