Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Standardization to Account for Cross-Cultural Response Bias

A Classification of Score Adjustment Procedures and Review of Research in JCCP

Ronald Fischer

Victoria University Wellington

The article reviews standardization methods commonly employed to adjust for response bias in cross-cultural research. First, different standardization procedures are reviewed and a classification scheme is provided. Standardization procedures are classified according to the statistical information used (means, standard deviation) and the source of this information (individual, group, or culture). Second, empirical research in JCCP between 1970 and 2002 is reviewed. Standardization has become more common in the 1990s, and there is a trend to rely more on standardized data. Most studies used standardization prior to analysis of variance and factor analytical techniques. However, an analysis of statistical properties of standardized measures indicates that results based on standardization are ambiguous. The use of statistical techniques and the interpretation of results based on standardized data are discussed.

Key Words: response bias • standardization • ipsative scores • cross-cultural research • factor analysis • score adjustment • cross-cultural differences

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 35, No. 3, 263-282 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0022022104264122


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
S. Dolnicar and B. Grun
Response Style Contamination of Student Evaluation Data
Journal of Marketing Education, August 1, 2009; 31(2): 160 - 172.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
K. D. Locke and K.-D. Baik
Does an Acquiescent Response Style Explain Why Koreans are Less Consistent than Americans?
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, March 1, 2009; 40(2): 319 - 323.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
R. F. Littrell
Book Review: Minkov, M. (2007). What makes us different and similar: A new interpretation of the World Values Survey and other cross-cultural data. Sofia, Bulgaria: Klasika y Stil Publishing House. ISBN: 978-954-327-023-1, 240 pp
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, September 1, 2008; 39(5): 654 - 658.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
J. Kurman and O. Dan
Unpackaging Cross-Cultural Differences in Initiation Between Israeli Subgroups: Tradition and Control Orientations as Mediating Factors
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, September 1, 2007; 38(5): 581 - 594.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Current SociologyHome page
B. Nauck and D. Klaus
The Varying Value of Children: Empirical Results from Eleven Societies in Asia, Africa and Europe
Current Sociology, July 1, 2007; 55(4): 487 - 503.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
H. Yang, E. Van de Vliert, and K. Shi
Interpersonal Relationship and Lay Third Parties' Side-Taking Preference: A Cross-Cultural Study Among Chinese and Dutch
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, July 1, 2007; 38(4): 438 - 457.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
K. D. Smith, S. T. Smith, and J. C. Christopher
What Defines the Good Person? Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Experts' Models With Lay Prototypes
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, May 1, 2007; 38(3): 333 - 360.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. L. Tsai, F. F. Miao, and E. Seppala
Good Feelings in Christianity and Buddhism: Religious Differences in Ideal Affect
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2007; 33(3): 409 - 421.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
A. Terracciano and R. R. McCrae
Perceptions of Americans and the Iraq Invasion: Implications for Understanding National Character Stereotypes.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, January 1, 2007; 38(6): 695 - 710.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. Fischer
Congruence and Functions of Personal and Cultural Values: Do My Values Reflect My Culture's Values?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2006; 32(11): 1419 - 1431.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
H Kobayashi, M Pian-Smith, M Sato, R Sawa, T Takeshita, and D Raemer
A cross-cultural survey of residents' perceived barriers in questioning/challenging authority.
Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2006; 15(4): 277 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Cross Cultural ManagementHome page
A.-W. Harzing
Response Styles in Cross-national Survey Research: A 26-country Study
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, August 1, 2006; 6(2): 243 - 266.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
M. W.-L. Cheung
Recovering Preipsative Information From Additive Ipsatized Data: A Factor Score Approach
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2006; 66(4): 565 - 588.
[Abstract] [PDF]