|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Standardization to Account for Cross-Cultural Response Bias
A Classification of Score Adjustment Procedures and Review of Research in JCCP
Ronald Fischer
Victoria University Wellington
The article reviews standardization methods commonly employed to adjust for response bias in cross-cultural research. First, different standardization procedures are reviewed and a classification scheme is provided. Standardization procedures are classified according to the statistical information used (means, standard deviation) and the source of this information (individual, group, or culture). Second, empirical research in JCCP between 1970 and 2002 is reviewed. Standardization has become more common in the 1990s, and there is a trend to rely more on standardized data. Most studies used standardization prior to analysis of variance and factor analytical techniques. However, an analysis of statistical properties of standardized measures indicates that results based on standardization are ambiguous. The use of statistical techniques and the interpretation of results based on standardized data are discussed.
Key Words: response bias standardization ipsative scores cross-cultural research factor analysis score adjustment cross-cultural differences
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 35, No. 3,
263-282 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0022022104264122

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Dolnicar and B. Grun
Response Style Contamination of Student Evaluation Data
Journal of Marketing Education,
August 1, 2009;
31(2):
160 - 172.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. D. Locke and K.-D. Baik
Does an Acquiescent Response Style Explain Why Koreans are Less Consistent than Americans?
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
March 1, 2009;
40(2):
319 - 323.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. F. Littrell
Book Review: Minkov, M. (2007). What makes us different and similar: A new interpretation of the World Values Survey and other cross-cultural data. Sofia, Bulgaria: Klasika y Stil Publishing House. ISBN: 978-954-327-023-1, 240 pp
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
September 1, 2008;
39(5):
654 - 658.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Kurman and O. Dan
Unpackaging Cross-Cultural Differences in Initiation Between Israeli Subgroups: Tradition and Control Orientations as Mediating Factors
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
September 1, 2007;
38(5):
581 - 594.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Nauck and D. Klaus
The Varying Value of Children: Empirical Results from Eleven Societies in Asia, Africa and Europe
Current Sociology,
July 1, 2007;
55(4):
487 - 503.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Yang, E. Van de Vliert, and K. Shi
Interpersonal Relationship and Lay Third Parties' Side-Taking Preference: A Cross-Cultural Study Among Chinese and Dutch
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
July 1, 2007;
38(4):
438 - 457.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. D. Smith, S. T. Smith, and J. C. Christopher
What Defines the Good Person? Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Experts' Models With Lay Prototypes
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
May 1, 2007;
38(3):
333 - 360.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Tsai, F. F. Miao, and E. Seppala
Good Feelings in Christianity and Buddhism: Religious Differences in Ideal Affect
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
March 1, 2007;
33(3):
409 - 421.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Terracciano and R. R. McCrae
Perceptions of Americans and the Iraq Invasion: Implications for Understanding National Character Stereotypes.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
January 1, 2007;
38(6):
695 - 710.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Fischer
Congruence and Functions of Personal and Cultural Values: Do My Values Reflect My Culture's Values?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
November 1, 2006;
32(11):
1419 - 1431.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H Kobayashi, M Pian-Smith, M Sato, R Sawa, T Takeshita, and D Raemer
A cross-cultural survey of residents' perceived barriers in questioning/challenging authority.
Qual. Saf. Health Care,
August 1, 2006;
15(4):
277 - 283.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A.-W. Harzing
Response Styles in Cross-national Survey Research: A 26-country Study
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management,
August 1, 2006;
6(2):
243 - 266.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. W.-L. Cheung
Recovering Preipsative Information From Additive Ipsatized Data: A Factor Score Approach
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
August 1, 2006;
66(4):
565 - 588.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|