This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (23) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Johnson, T. Articles by Shavitt, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Relation Between Culture and Response Styles

Evidence From 19 Countries

University of Illinois at Chicago

Patrick Kulesa

University of Illinois at Chicago

Isr Llc

University of Illinois at Chicago

Young Ik Cho

University of Illinois at Chicago

Sharon Shavitt

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

The authors investigated at the country level the effects of four cultural orientations identified and studied by Hofstede on two commonly recognized response biases: extreme response style and acquiescent responding. Data are presented from approximately 18,000 survey questionnaires completed by employees in 19 nations on five continents (Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, India, Japan, Malaysia, Portugal, Turkey, the United Kingdom, Mexico, the Philippines, Poland, Singapore, Hong Kong, France, and Italy). Hierarchical linear modeling was employed to examine the associations between person-level response styles and country-level cultural orientations. Consistent with theoretical expectations, power distance and masculinity were found to be positively and independently associated with extreme response style. Individualism, uncertainty avoidance, power distance, and masculinity were each found to be negatively associated with acquiescent response behavior. Further research is needed to identify how question characteristics might interact with cultural orientations to influence response behavior.

Key Words: acquiescence • extreme response style • culture-level • cross-cultural • method bias

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. La Roche and M. S. Christopher Culture and Empirically Supported Treatments: On the Road to a Collision? Culture Psychology, September 1, 2008; 14(3): 333 - 356. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Minkov Self-Enhancement and Self-Stability Predict School Achievement at the National Level Cross-Cultural Research, May 1, 2008; 42(2): 172 - 196. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Aegisdottir, L. H. Gerstein, and D. C. Cinarbas Methodological Issues in Cross-Cultural Counseling Research: Equivalence, Bias, and Translations The Counseling Psychologist, March 1, 2008; 36(2): 188 - 219. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. P. Schmitt, J. Allik, R. R. McCrae, and V. Benet-Martinez The Geographic Distribution of Big Five Personality Traits: Patterns and Profiles of Human Self-Description Across 56 Nations Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, March 1, 2007; 38(2): 173 - 212. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Lamm and H. Keller Understanding Cultural Models of Parenting: The Role of Intracultural Variation and Response Style Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, January 1, 2007; 38(1): 50 - 57. [Abstract] [PDF]