This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Smith, K. D. Articles by Christopher, J. C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

What Defines the Good Person? Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Experts' Models With Lay Prototypes

University of Guam

Seyda Türk Smith

University of Guam

John Chambers Christopher

Montana State University at Bozeman

"Good" is a fundamental concept present in all cultures, and experts in values and positive psychology have mapped good's many aspects in human beings. Which aspects do laypersons typically access and consider as they make everyday judgments of goodness? Does the answer vary with culture? To address these questions, the authors compiled prototypes of the good person from laypersons' free-listings in seven cultures and used experts' classifications to content-analyze and compare the prototypes. Benevolence, conformity, and traditionalism dominated the features that laypersons frequently attributed to good people. Other features—competence in particular—varied widely in their accessibility across cultures. These findings depart from those obtained in research using expert-designed self-report inventories, highlighting the need to consider everyday accessibility when comparing cultures' definitions of the good person.

Key Words: positive psychology • moral reasoning • prototypes • values • content analysis • psychological well-being • psychological realism

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?