Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0022022108318112v1
39/4/345    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fontaine, J. R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, S. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
This version was published on July 1, 2008
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 39, No. 4, 345-365 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0022022108318112

Structural Equivalence of the Values Domain Across Cultures

Distinguishing Sampling Fluctuations From Meaningful Variation

Johnny R. J. Fontaine

Ghent University, Belgium, Johnny.Fontaine{at}UGent.be

Ype H. Poortinga

Tilburg University, the Netherlands, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium

Luc Delbeke

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium

Shalom H. Schwartz

The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel

The authors examine the cross-cultural equivalence of the internal structure of the values domain, as measured by the Schwartz Value Survey. Data come from 38 countries, each represented by a student and a teacher sample. In seeking to distinguish lack of fit of the theorized value model from a lack of equivalence in the data and the impact of random sampling fluctuations from valid structural differences, the authors find the following: (a) The Schwartz value theory provides an excellent representation of the average value structure across samples; (b) sampling fluctuation causes deviations from this average structure; (c) sampling fluctuation cannot account for all these deviations; (d) samples of students fit the overall value structure better than samples of teachers, and samples from Western countries better than those from non-Western countries; and (e) the deviations from the average structure exhibit a systematic pattern: the higher the level of societal development of a country, the greater the contrast between protection and growth values.

Key Words: values • structural equivalence • Schwartz Value Survey


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
E. Davidov, P. Schmidt, and S. H. Schwartz
Bringing Values Back In: The Adequacy of the European Social Survey to Measure Values in 20 Countries
Public Opin Q, August 21, 2008; (2008) nfn035v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]