Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here to browse PSPB online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Irwin, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Feiden, C. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Emic and Unfamiliar Category Sorting of Mano Farmers and U.S. Undergraduates

Marc H. Irwin

Gary N. Schafer

Cynthia P. Feiden

University of New Mexico

Mano farmers of Liberia, West Africa, and U.S. undergraduate men were tested on a rice-sorting task appropriate to the Mano cultural setting and an analogous card-sorting task appropriate to the U.S. cultural setting. U.S. Ss performed more card sorts than Mano Ss, while Mano Ss performed more rice sorts than U.S. Ss. A larger drop in performance level was associated with the use of an unfamiliar, as compared to an emic-or culturally appropriate-sorting task for the U.S. college students than for nonliterate Mano farmers. Both U.S. and Mano Ss most readily sorted by perceptually salient and unidimensional stimulus features and had difficulty shifting sorting dimensions, when tested with an unfamiliar task. U.S. men differed from Mano men in sorting more rapidly on both tasks, and in being more often able to describe verbally the basis for unfamiliar task sorts they had performed.

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 5, No. 4, 407-423 (1974)
DOI: 10.1177/002202217400500403


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
D. L. Best and N. M. Ruther
Cross-Cultural Themes in Developmental Psychology: An Examination of Texts, Handbooks, and Reviews
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, March 1, 1994; 25(1): 54 - 77.
[Abstract]


Home page
International Journal of Behavioral DevelopmentHome page
R. Serpell, S. S. Zaman, S. Huq, S. Ferial, M. L. M. Silveira, A. M. C. de S. Dias, A. L. R. de Campos, H. S. Narayanan, P. M. Rao, M. J. Thorburn, et al.
Assessment Criteria for Severe Intellectual Disability in Various Cultural Settings
International Journal of Behavioral Development, March 1, 1988; 11(1): 117 - 144.
[Abstract] [PDF]