Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Handbook of U.S. Latino Psychology

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chun, K.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Yoo, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Extreme Response Style in Cross-Cultural Research

A Reminder

Kl-Taek Chun

John B. Campbell

Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan

Jong Hae Yoo

Yonsei University (Seoul, Korea)

The neglect of the consequences of the Extreme Response Style (ERS) phenomenon in cross-cultural research is documented through a selective literature review. Consideration of ERS differences permitted derivation of three logical consequences that pertain to (a) differences in group means, (b) the internal consistency of measures and the correlation among measures, and (c) results of dimensional analyses. Comparison of U.S. and Korean student samples on a 1 30-item questionnaire revealed stronger ERS in the U.S. sample. Furthermore, the predictions derived from ERS differences were confirmed, thus demonstrating the credibility of the ERS argument. General implications of ERS for cross-cultural research are discussed.

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 5, No. 4, 465-480 (1974)
DOI: 10.1177/002202217400500407


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
S. Dolnicar and B. Grun
Response Style Contamination of Student Evaluation Data
Journal of Marketing Education, August 1, 2009; 31(2): 160 - 172.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Cross Cultural ManagementHome page
G. Casimir and D. A. Waldman
A Cross Cultural Comparison of the Importance of Leadership Traits for Effective Low-level and High-level Leaders: Australia and China
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, April 1, 2007; 7(1): 47 - 60.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Cross Cultural ManagementHome page
A.-W. Harzing
Response Styles in Cross-national Survey Research: A 26-country Study
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, August 1, 2006; 6(2): 243 - 266.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
G. Casimir, D. A. Waldman, T. Bartram, and S. Yang
Trust and the Relationship Between Leadership and Follower Performance: Opening the Black Box in Australia and China
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, January 1, 2006; 12(3): 68 - 84.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
T. Johnson, P. Kulesa, I. Llc, Y. I. Cho, and S. Shavitt
The Relation Between Culture and Response Styles: Evidence From 19 Countries
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, March 1, 2005; 36(2): 264 - 277.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
R. Fischer
Standardization to Account for Cross-Cultural Response Bias: A Classification of Score Adjustment Procedures and Review of Research in JCCP
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, May 1, 2004; 35(3): 263 - 282.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
H. van Herk, Y. H. Poortinga, and T. M. M. Verhallen
Response Styles in Rating Scales: Evidence of Method Bias in Data From Six EU Countries
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, May 1, 2004; 35(3): 346 - 360.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
G. W. Cheung and R. B. Rensvold
Assessing Extreme and Acquiescence Response Sets in Cross-Cultural Research Using Structural Equations Modeling
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, March 1, 2000; 31(2): 187 - 212.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cross-Cultural ResearchHome page
J. L. Gibbons, J. A. Zellner, and D. J. Rudek
Effects of Language and Meaningfulness on the Use of Extreme Response Style by Spanish-English Bilinguals
Cross-Cultural Research, November 1, 1999; 33(4): 369 - 381.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Cross-Cultural PsychologyHome page
C. H. Hui and H. C. Triandis
Effects of Culture and Response Format on Extreme Response Style
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, September 1, 1989; 20(3): 296 - 309.
[Abstract]


Home page
School Psychology InternationalHome page
P. Pedersen
A Procedure for Testing an American Test in an Indonesian Context
School Psychology International, July 1, 1985; 6(3): 151 - 157.
[Abstract]