|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Extreme Response Style in Cross-Cultural Research
A Reminder
Kl-Taek Chun
John B. Campbell
Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan
Jong Hae Yoo
Yonsei University (Seoul, Korea)
The neglect of the consequences of the Extreme Response Style (ERS) phenomenon in cross-cultural research is documented through a selective literature review. Consideration of ERS differences permitted derivation of three logical consequences that pertain to (a) differences in group means, (b) the internal consistency of measures and the correlation among measures, and (c) results of dimensional analyses. Comparison of U.S. and Korean student samples on a 1 30-item questionnaire revealed stronger ERS in the U.S. sample. Furthermore, the predictions derived from ERS differences were confirmed, thus demonstrating the credibility of the ERS argument. General implications of ERS for cross-cultural research are discussed.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 5, No. 4,
465-480 (1974)
DOI: 10.1177/002202217400500407

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Dolnicar and B. Grun
Response Style Contamination of Student Evaluation Data
Journal of Marketing Education,
August 1, 2009;
31(2):
160 - 172.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Casimir and D. A. Waldman
A Cross Cultural Comparison of the Importance of Leadership Traits for Effective Low-level and High-level Leaders: Australia and China
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management,
April 1, 2007;
7(1):
47 - 60.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A.-W. Harzing
Response Styles in Cross-national Survey Research: A 26-country Study
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management,
August 1, 2006;
6(2):
243 - 266.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Casimir, D. A. Waldman, T. Bartram, and S. Yang
Trust and the Relationship Between Leadership and Follower Performance: Opening the Black Box in Australia and China
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies,
January 1, 2006;
12(3):
68 - 84.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Johnson, P. Kulesa, I. Llc, Y. I. Cho, and S. Shavitt
The Relation Between Culture and Response Styles: Evidence From 19 Countries
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
March 1, 2005;
36(2):
264 - 277.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Fischer
Standardization to Account for Cross-Cultural Response Bias: A Classification of Score Adjustment Procedures and Review of Research in JCCP
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
May 1, 2004;
35(3):
263 - 282.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. van Herk, Y. H. Poortinga, and T. M. M. Verhallen
Response Styles in Rating Scales: Evidence of Method Bias in Data From Six EU Countries
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
May 1, 2004;
35(3):
346 - 360.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. W. Cheung and R. B. Rensvold
Assessing Extreme and Acquiescence Response Sets in Cross-Cultural Research Using Structural Equations Modeling
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
March 1, 2000;
31(2):
187 - 212.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Gibbons, J. A. Zellner, and D. J. Rudek
Effects of Language and Meaningfulness on the Use of Extreme Response Style by Spanish-English Bilinguals
Cross-Cultural Research,
November 1, 1999;
33(4):
369 - 381.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. H. Hui and H. C. Triandis
Effects of Culture and Response Format on Extreme Response Style
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,
September 1, 1989;
20(3):
296 - 309.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Pedersen
A Procedure for Testing an American Test in an Indonesian Context
School Psychology International,
July 1, 1985;
6(3):
151 - 157.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|
|
|